Reed v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2026-64, decided August 5, 2026. Your own books are the first witness, and they testify exactly as written.
The general ledger called it the Scott Reed Float Loan. The tax returns called the same money a deductible business expense, and the Tax Court went with the ledger.
Scott Reed knew real estate. He grew up on his father's and grandfather's jobsites, consulted for the Navy on the disposal of closed bases, and built a firm specializing in the redevelopment of historic buildings, with projects up and down Main Street in Little Rock. He also personally guaranteed the projects' construction loans, so when a fire, a flooded building, a collapsed wall, and an unfavorable change in Arkansas credit law put the developments under strain, he moved roughly $811,000 from the family's personal accounts into the project entities across 2014 and 2015.
On their returns the Reeds deducted those transfers as unreimbursed partnership expenses, and at trial they offered three theories for keeping the deduction: that the payments were really expenses of his consulting firm, that they were partnership costs he was obligated to carry, or that they had become worthless debts. Every theory ran into the same problem. The projects' own books had recorded nearly every dollar in loan accounts bearing his name, the Scott Reed Float Loan at one entity and the Scott Reed Short Term Loan and Long Term Loan at the other, and some of the money had already been paid back to him. The court answered with a rule the Supreme Court set down half a century ago, that a taxpayer is free to organize his affairs as he chooses, but "once having done so, he must accept the tax consequences of his choice, whether contemplated or not."
The same trial showed what the opposite looks like. Where Reed's testimony was credible and nothing in the record contradicted it, he won, keeping a $40,000 advance out of income, saving a $50,000 farm rent deduction, and holding onto deductions for the consultants and law firms his company hired. The court was not hostile to him. It simply read what his own companies had written down.
The practical point is quieter than the story. The label your bookkeeper types the day money moves is not clerical trivia, because it is the first version of events every examiner and every judge will read. If a transfer is meant to be an expense, the books have to say expense while it happens, and if it is a loan, there should be terms, interest, and a repayment pattern that match the word. Deciding at filing time what the money meant a year earlier is how a taxpayer ends up arguing against his own ledger.
They should say what you mean while the money moves, because the court will read them exactly as written. If you want a written read on where your own setup stands, that is what the free Tax Position Review is for.
Book your free Tax Position Review →